I think no one should be surprised that AI is making kids dumb.
So, what now? Do you ban AI for all school kids? Or do we evolve beyond what AI generates?
Key Points
MIT Study: Your brain on AI
Study Setup: Three groups — ChatGPT users, search engine users, and unaided writers.
Neural Findings:
LLM users showed reduced brain connectivity and lower alpha/beta wave activity.
Brain-only users had stronger cognitive engagement.
Behavioral Impact:
LLM users felt less ownership of their work.
They struggled with recall and originality.
Long-Term Effects: Consistent underperformance over 4 months.
AI for Scientific Discoveries
Source: MIT CSAIL (2025)
AI is accelerating breakthroughs in physics, biology, and medicine.
Focus on high-efficiency, high-accuracy models.
Encourages derisking AI for broader adoption.
Impacts on the workforce
1. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on AI as a Transformative Tool for Learning and Work
Source: MSN article (https://www.msn.com/en-in/money/topstories/nvidia-ceo-talks-about-ai-replacing-human-jobs-says-it-will-change-everyones-job/ar-AA1Gygq3) and Times of India (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/nvidia-ceo-jensen-huang-theres-a-new-programming-language-it-is-called/articleshow/121746887.cms)
Statements:
Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, asserts that AI will not lead to massive unemployment but will transform every job, including his own. He emphasizes that only about 30 million people globally (out of 8 billion) currently know how to use AI effectively, highlighting a significant skill gap.
At London Tech Week, Huang described AI as “the great equalizer” for the future of work, particularly in programming. He introduced the concept of a “human” programming language, where AI can be programmed through natural language interactions (e.g., speaking or drawing schematics) rather than traditional coding languages like C++. This makes AI accessible to non-technical users.
Huang advises users to “ask AI nicely” to unlock its potential, using an example of requesting an AI to write a poem, suggesting that intuitive interaction with AI can democratize access to technology.
Implications for the General Public:
Learning Opportunity: The shift to a “human” programming language lowers barriers to entry for learning AI, enabling people without formal coding skills to engage with and leverage AI tools. This could democratize education and skill acquisition, making technical knowledge more accessible.
Skill Development Urgency: The limited number of AI-proficient individuals (30 million) underscores the need for widespread AI education. The public must learn to interact with AI to remain competitive in the workforce, as those who master AI will have a significant advantage.
Educational Transformation: AI could facilitate personalized learning at scale, potentially through AI tutors, as Huang has suggested in other contexts (e.g., AI tutors redefining education).
Potential Risk: Without proactive learning, individuals risk being outpaced by those who adopt AI, as Huang warns, “You’re not going to lose your job to an AI, but you’re going to lose your job to someone who uses AI.”
2. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei’s Concerns About AI’s Impact on Jobs
Statements:
Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, warns that AI could eliminate up to 50% of entry-level white-collar jobs within five years, potentially driving US unemployment to 20%. He urges policymakers to prepare for significant economic disruption due to AI advancements in sectors like technology, finance, law, and consulting.
Amodei advocates for a national transparency standard for AI developers to ensure public and policymaker awareness of AI’s capabilities and risks.
Implications for the General Public:
Learning Challenge: Amodei’s dire predictions suggest that entry-level workers, who often rely on initial roles to gain experience and skills, may face significant barriers. This emphasizes the need for rapid upskilling in AI-related competencies to stay relevant.
Public Policy and Education: His call for transparency could lead to greater public access to information about AI’s capabilities, potentially fostering educational initiatives to prepare workers for AI-driven changes.
Economic Anxiety: The prediction of high unemployment could create fear among the public, particularly young professionals, pushing them to prioritize AI literacy to secure their career prospects.
3. Jensen Huang’s Rebuttal of Amodei’s Predictions
Statements:
Huang strongly disagrees with Amodei, arguing that AI will not eliminate jobs but will transform them, creating new opportunities through increased productivity. He likens responsible AI development to medical research, advocating for transparency and collaboration over monopolistic control. Further, he criticizes Amodei’s view that AI is so dangerous and expensive that only a few should develop it, stating, “Don’t do it in a dark room and tell me it’s safe.”
Huang believes AI will enhance creativity and opportunity, suggesting that job obsolescence will be offset by new roles created by AI-driven productivity.
Implications for the General Public:
Optimistic Outlook for Learning: Huang’s perspective encourages the public to view AI as a tool for empowerment rather than a threat, promoting learning initiatives that focus on collaboration with AI.
Accessibility to AI Education: His emphasis on open AI development could lead to more accessible educational resources and tools, reducing the exclusivity of AI knowledge and enabling broader public participation.
Workforce Resilience: By framing AI as a job creator, Huang’s stance may reduce public anxiety and encourage proactive learning of AI skills to adapt to evolving job roles.
4. Other Tech CEOs on AI’s Impact on Jobs and Learning
Source: Indian Express (https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/artificial-intelligence/ai-impact-jobs-what-nvidia-openai-linkedin-ceos-said-10068257/)
Statements:
Sam Altman (OpenAI CEO): Altman acknowledges that AI could lead to “whole classes of jobs going away” but believes humans are adaptable and will find new solutions. He sees AI, like ChatGPT, as a powerful tool that could enhance human capabilities, suggesting a future where robots perform physical tasks.
Ravi Kumar (Cognizant CEO): Kumar argues that AI will accelerate training for fresh graduates, lowering barriers to entry in industries like tech, consulting, and finance, creating “new-age professionals.”
Mark Cuban (Entrepreneur): Cuban advises young people to “read books and learn how to use AI in every way, shape, and form,” describing AI as a “living library” that can assist anyone, regardless of background.
Implications for the General Public:
Adaptability Through Learning: Altman’s view highlights the need for continuous learning to adapt to AI-driven changes, suggesting that educational systems should prioritize teaching AI interaction and problem-solving skills.
Upskilling Opportunities: Kumar’s perspective indicates that AI could streamline onboarding and training, making it easier for new entrants to learn and enter competitive fields. This could benefit young professionals and students entering the workforce.
Universal Access to Knowledge: Cuban’s metaphor of AI as a “living library” implies that AI can democratize learning, providing instant access to knowledge and skills for people of all backgrounds, potentially reducing educational disparities.
Proactive Skill Acquisition: The collective advice from these leaders underscores the urgency for the public to proactively learn AI skills to remain competitive, as those who fail to adapt may be outpaced by AI-savvy peers.
5. Broader Context and Trends in AI’s Impact
Source: Various articles and X posts
Statements:
Huang has emphasized AI tutors as a future tool for personalized learning at scale, requiring high-quality data to be effective.
Posts on X reflect ongoing debates about AI’s job impact, with some users echoing Huang’s optimism about new job creation, while others express skepticism about the nature of these new roles.
The Indian Express notes that AI is already transforming roles like computer programming, marketing, and customer service, with workers increasingly using AI tools in their jobs.
Implications for the General Public:
Personalized Education: AI tutors could revolutionize learning by offering tailored educational experiences, potentially making high-quality education more accessible and affordable.
Public Discourse and Awareness: The debate on X highlights the need for public education about AI’s potential and risks, encouraging individuals to engage with AI tools to understand their capabilities.
Workforce Transformation: The integration of AI in roles like programming and customer service suggests that learning to use AI tools is becoming a core job requirement, necessitating widespread retraining and upskilling programs.
Share this post